The Left Is Trying to Normalize Pedophilia

We are talking Columbia University professorship level indoctrination.

This is the 21st century Democrat party.

A pro-pedophile group is training mental health providers to implement “affirmative MAP therapy”—a framework explicitly modeled on LGBT-affirmative therapy, aimed at affirming pedophiles’ attraction to minors and integrating that attraction into their identity.

A pro-pedophile group is training mental health providers to implement “affirmative MAP therapy”—a framework explicitly modeled on LGBT-affirmative therapy, aimed at affirming pedophiles’ attraction to minors and integrating that attraction into their identity. pic.twitter.com/tbNIVW6jPS

— Christina Buttons (@buttonslives) May 2, 2025

Ngo scoop: An “affirming” conference for “MAPs” (minor-attracted person, i.e., p—dophile) is taking place in Ohio on May 2–4. The conference states its goal is to teach how to become “empowered to work confidently and affirmingly with MAPs.”

The event’s speakers are woke leftist… pic.twitter.com/WTwRmWCLI6

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) May 3, 2025

One of the speakers at the “affirmative MAP” (minor attracted person) conference in Ohio is Nadav Antebi-Gruszka, a trans nonbinary radical leftist who teaches psychology at @Columbia.

He offers discounted sex-positive therapy rates for people who are p—dophiles. He says he… pic.twitter.com/96Zf8Nq9q5

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) May 3, 2025

Don’t be fooled by the nomenclature of Minor-Attracted Persons or MAPs. A conference this past weekend in Ohio held the group B4U-ACT urged clients to, “train mental-health providers in “affirmative MAP therapy,” which seeks to help clients accept their “age of attraction” as an intrinsic and valid part of their identity.” City Journal: The organization discourages clinicians from diagnosing clients with Pedoph***c Disorder and instead claims that pedoph***a is a “sexual age orientation….” B4U-ACT repeatedly compares pedoph***a with homosexuality, likening the stigma gay people once faced to the “oppression” experienced by pedoph***s. This is a misleading comparison: unlike adults in same-sex relationships, children can never consent to sex with adults. Equating these fundamentally different forms of sexual conduct erases the moral and legal distinction between adult relationships and child victimization. The group nevertheless casts pedoph***a in a sympathetic light. Its materials describe pedoph**ic feelings as a form of “romantic affection” and a “desire for friendship,” and claim that pedoph**es often seek to “protect children and make them happy….” under the influence of progressive activism, groups like B4U-ACT are recasting pedoph***c attraction as something to be accepted rather than contained. In doing so, they risk collapsing critical moral distinctions and shifting the focus away from the safety and well-being of children—the population most in need of protection. (City Journal).