Taibbi: Trump Has A “Once In A Lifetime” Chance For Disclosure

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

I was incredibly stoked to have my friend and Substack compatriot Matt Taibbi on today for an hourlong chat about the mainstream media’s implosion, the new administration, spending cuts and the unique opportunity this administration has to shatter the Orwellian path the nation has been put on by the establishment and legacy media.

Few voices in journalism today have been as incisive and unfiltered as Matt Taibbi’s. Once a staple of Rolling Stone, Taibbi has become one of the most vocal critics of mainstream media, corporate influence, and the failures of American journalism.

Now, as one of the leading voices on Substack, he has watched firsthand as the landscape of media and politics undergoes tectonic shifts.

The Exodus to Substack: “A Universe is Healing” Moment

The conversation opened with an amusing yet telling observation: Jim Acosta, once a CNN mainstay and vocal critic of independent platforms, had landed on Substack after his unceremonious departure from CNN. Taibbi couldn’t help but note the irony.

“Most of us who came to Substack early came here either because we were purged from mainstream media organizations, or in my case, I just sort of read the writing on the wall and felt like it was going to be a better move for me career-wise,” he said.

Acosta’s arrival, along with other legacy media figures like Jennifer Rubin and Norm Eisen, signals a broader shift, he said. Once dismissive of independent platforms as “grifters and losers,” these same journalists are now scrambling to find an audience in a media world that no longer guarantees them a corporate paycheck.

“I mean, I won’t be surprised to see Joy Reid here in a few weeks,” Taibbi quipped during our hourlong chat. 

He pointed to the collapse of audience trust in legacy institutions as a driving force behind this exodus. The public, he argues, has woken up to the reality that mainstream news is not about truth but about feeding an audience what it wants to hear—an “audience optimization model.”

“They got away from this idea that we’ve got to be right. Even if we’re going to be slanted, we can’t screw things up. And so what they’re doing now—they’re seeing their numbers plummet, and their first instinct is, well, let’s just get rid of the people who have the worst numbers.”

But as he noted, firing low-rated hosts doesn’t fix the deeper problem: they have no plan to win back public trust.

The Death Spiral of Corporate Media

As legacy media layoffs pile up and the industry scrambles for solutions, Taibbi remains skeptical that any major course correction is coming.

“What you see right now is almost complete paralysis at these big media organizations. They really don’t know what to do.”

Rather than reassessing their flawed model, major networks are doubling down, attempting to “optimize” their content for the dwindling loyal audience they still have.

“They’re not coming up with a new ethos for how to cover things. They’re seeing their numbers collapse, and their first instinct is to just fire the people who have the highest negatives when they do their surveys. But they don’t have a replacement strategy.”

The case of Joy Reid’s firing at MSNBC underscored the point. The network, rather than innovating, was resorting to desperate measures like bringing back Rachel Maddow for more frequent programming.

The conversation eventually turned to what he sees as an unprecedented moment in history—a rare window where the public is demanding accountability like never before.

“I don’t think in our lifetimes there’s ever going to be an opportunity to get some of that stuff out there like there is right now,” he said, referring to transparency efforts across media, government, and finance.

I noted: “If we make the public aware of exactly where all this money is going… people are going to be forced to look back on it—including the nefarious actors—and say, ‘Hey, we were a little sloppy last time. We need to clean it up a little bit.’ And sadly, I feel like that’s the best we can hope for.”

Still, he’s not optimistic that change will come easily.

“They’ve forgotten that information doesn’t belong to them,” he said of government bureaucracies withholding classified material. “There isn’t some separate group of people who have a particularized interest in keeping that secret that supersedes ours. That’s just a fictitious thing they’ve convinced us to believe.”

Whether it’s long-classified JFK files, hidden financial records, or revelations about the intelligence community’s past actions, Taibbi sees no justification for keeping the public in the dark.“They better release everything,” he warned. “People are going to get impatient.”

What Comes Next?

As the interview wound down, one thing was clear—whether in media, government, or finance, the establishment is fighting to hold onto its crumbling authority. But with every desperate move they make, they only accelerate their own demise.

This conversation was another reminder of why independent voices are more crucial than ever. In a world where media giants crumble and governments fight tooth and nail to keep secrets, the truth has never been more important.

Taibbi sees the current moment as a unique chance to shake things up. The collapse of mainstream media, the discrediting of political elites, and the exposure of financial corruption all point to a rare opportunity to rewire the system. Whether that happens, though, depends on whether the public stays engaged.

“The public is not going to accept the buildup that we had again,” he said. “At least that’s what I’m hoping.”

For now, Substack and independent platforms are filling the void left by a media industry that has abandoned journalism in favor of narrative control. As for the institutions that have held power for decades?

Their reckoning may only just be beginning. (WATCH THE FULL HOUR-LONG VIDEO INTERVIEW WITH MATT TAIBBI HERE)

 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.