Hidden Powers Are Using Current Crisis To Impose a New World Order

The current global situation is increasingly worrying. First, there is the war in Ukraine, which many initially considered an isolated regional conflict, but which has emerged as a key piece in a complex international puzzle.

If we look back in time, we see that the relationship between Russia and Ukraine has always been marked by historical tensions and intermittent conflicts. Both countries share common roots in Kievan Rus, a medieval state considered the origin of both Russia and Ukraine. However, over the centuries, Ukraine was under the control of different empires, including the Russian Empire, which generated cultural and political tensions.

In the 20th century, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, but after its independence in 1991, relations with Russia deteriorated, particularly due to issues such as the sovereignty of Crimea and Ukraine’s pro-Western orientation.

And what began as a Russian military operation in February 2022 quickly escalated into the trigger for an unprecedented global transformation.

Interestingly, subsequent events have shown that this conflict was meticulously planned as part of a larger agenda. It is no coincidence that countries like Sweden and Finland abandoned decades of neutrality just before the conflict, nor that technology corporations simultaneously developed advanced social control systems. The crucial question is not who fired the first shot, but what hidden powers are using this crisis to impose a New World Order.

Secondly, we have the much-talked-about “reset” that the World Economic Forum has prepared for us, along with the ominous “blackout” being talked about in various circles, which could very well refer to the famous “three days of darkness.” This leads us to question whether we are facing a technological blackout or something much deeper. Recently in Chile, the 12 hours of darkness experienced by the population were not just an isolated event. But not only in Chile, but also in Argentina, Uruguay, Cuba, Panama, and Bolivia, they were a symptom of a larger problem looming over us.

Furthermore, since 2021, the concept of the renowned Cyberpolygon has been the subject of debate within the framework of the World Economic Forum, where a simulation was carried out illustrating the global collapse of supply chains and logistics systems.

Third, we see that through figures like Christine Lagarde, a person who has not been democratically elected by anyone, we have been warned about the imminent imposition of the digital euro in October of this year. This currency change has not been democratically agreed upon; it is an undemocratic measure imposed. This is not a coincidence, but part of a more insidious plan that seeks to eradicate physical money and, with it, the elimination of our freedom and privacy. Surveillance of our spending will intensify in the name of “sustainability” and based on consumption criteria imposed on us from above, far removed from our individual decisions.

Meanwhile, measures such as banning single-occupant vehicles are becoming increasingly popular in Europe. France has implemented a new measure in the capital: starting May 1, a lane on the ring road will be reserved for vehicles with two or more occupants, with the aim of increasing car occupancy and encouraging carpooling. During rush hour, from 7 to 10:30 a.m. and from 4 to 8 p.m., those driving alone in this lane will be fined.

In Spain, this proposal is already being analyzed. “Traveling alone by car has no future,” states the European Commission, an unelected institution. Let us not be fooled; these initiatives are not motivated by climate change, but rather pursue a hidden agenda. The reality is that this is not genuine climate change, but rather “climate manipulation.” The true purpose of these measures is to restrict people’s mobility. There is an obvious intention to keep us confined to our homes with some hidden agenda.

In addition, restrictions are being implemented to ban vehicles from major city centers. All of these policies are being established globally under the concept of the New World Order.

And apart from all of the above, in recent years, the concept of “15-minute cities” has been presented as an innovative solution for modern urban life, promising that citizens will be able to access all their essential services within a short walk. However, behind this facade of convenience lies a darker agenda: the restriction of mobility and individual freedom. By designing urban spaces where everything we need is within reach, we are pushed to accept a sedentary and controlled life, where exploration beyond our “bubble” becomes a complicated and undesirable endeavor.

This urban model, promoted by some political and corporate elites, could be interpreted as an attempt to consolidate control over the population. The idea is simple: reduce citizens’ mobility, limiting their ability to travel to other areas of the city or outside of it. Doing so fosters a dependence on local services, which can ultimately be manipulated by those in power. Furthermore, this strategy could facilitate greater surveillance and monitoring of citizens’ movements, as the technology needed to implement these 15-minute cities can also be used to track and control the population. It could be interpreted as seeking to exert control over our lives, even at the mental level, given that graphene is already found in our neurons, with the aim of extracting something from this “human farm.” Thus, what appears to be a step toward a more sustainable future could, in reality, be a step toward a more restricted and controlled society. All designed to implement the New World Order.

Behind the narrative of progress and sustainability, a meticulously orchestrated plan looms to establish a new world order, where individual freedoms are sacrificed on the altar of efficiency and control. Policies that promote the centralization of services and the creation of self-sufficient environments not only seek to improve the quality of life but are also designed to shape conformist and obedient citizen behavior, similar to China’s. As technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data are deployed to manage these cities, the foundation is being laid for a system of governance that prioritizes security over freedom, where every move and decision is influenced and monitored by those who dictate the rules of the game. Thus, supposed modernization becomes a mechanism of subjugation, where the illusion of choice is disguised as convenience and well-being.

Were all these restrictions included in the electoral manifestos of the parties that govern us? Clearly, the answer is a resounding no. What we are experiencing is an accelerated process that ignores the sentiments of civil society, whether left, right, or center.

The question that arises is: are we really prepared for what this entails? The feeling of helplessness is palpable. The political elite, often disconnected from the reality of ordinary citizens, seems determined to drag us toward a war and, at best, toward economic ruin justified by excessive defense spending.

Youth Recruitment and Preparation for War

Recent attempts to recruit young people in Spanish secondary schools have raised alarm bells about what could be ominous preparations for a future war.

This disturbing trend is not limited to the Iberian Peninsula; similar campaigns are underway in France, such as the controversial project aimed at “mobilizing” more young volunteers to “strengthen” the armed forces.

For its part, the German government approved the new voluntary military service in November 2024, a new system to incentivize young people to perform their military service. This should allow the armed forces to recruit thousands of new soldiers to confront the growing threats from Russia.

But they are not the only countries, with different formats and levels of commitment. I have seen how up to 10 European countries have promoted some form of forced military service or voluntary recruitment for fear of a war with Russia: Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Greece.

But what lies behind this apparent call to arms? We cannot lose sight of the fact that this recruitment of young people could be seen by some as an act of patriotism; however, this idea was also conceived to contribute to more human sacrifices. Throughout history, elites have manipulated the masses, using fear and misinformation to carry out their dark purposes. In ancient times, human sacrifices took place atop pyramids, where the faithful were deceived with the promise that the light of the sun would not go out. Today, sacrifices have taken a more insidious form: human beings are divided and driven to kill each other in crusades and world wars, orchestrated by those who truly control the fate of the world.

Now, sacrifices are justified under the guise of vaccination campaigns and the threat of a new war. There has never been true peace in this world; war and sacrifice are tools in the hands of those who pull the strings of power. It’s understandable that many people wonder why certain situations occur today, in the 21st century, without fully understanding what is happening. However, when observing reality through the prism of the “E” Factor (E: ELLOS in Spanish, They in English), everything makes sense. When analyzing history, education, culture, politics, science, religion, etc. from this perspective, a fundamental truth is revealed: this is not our civilization, and the world has never been, and is never, truly under the control of human beings.

Television networks (disinformation media) and experts discuss the possibility of sending young people to war with the promise of funding their studies, which could be interpreted as a strategy to psyche up the population toward a state of war. In this sense, the media become opinion generators that, despite presenting different positions, seem to agree on the inevitability of conflict.

Now everyone talks about war, not peace. This situation is reminiscent of the communicative dynamics of the 1930s and 1940s, when war dominated the cultural and media narrative: cinema, the Hollywood machine, newspapers, radio—everything was geared toward war. Everyone on their own side, on their own faction, but everything was geared toward war.

The following troubling question must be asked: what does Ukraine really represent for Russia? In the blink of an eye, in just two minutes, Russia could wipe Ukraine off the map if it so chose. However, the reality is that it is not the Russian leaders who set the beat of this war symphony; there are more powerful, hidden forces that dictate when and how they should act.

The Ukrainian crisis took on an alarming magnitude after the “Fake Pandemic,” an episode that exposed the fragility of nations that, until then, had remained silent. The war, which just a couple of years ago seemed like a forgotten issue, is now revealed as a crucial link in a broader plan destined to transform humanity as a whole. Every move on this geopolitical chessboard is imbued with a strategy that goes beyond what the mainstream media dares to reveal. Are we really facing a territorial conflict, or is it part of a much larger game? The answer could be more disturbing than we imagine.

The manipulation of fear is key to this game; we are bombarded with alarming news, conflicts, and divisions that keep us in a constant state of alert. The strategy is clear: create an environment of despair where people cry out for a savior, and that savior, when he finally appears, will be hailed as the hero who will ease our anguish. But before this happens, we must witness a spectacle of panic and chaos, designed to keep us controlled and vulnerable. This is only the beginning of what is to come, and the more fear intensifies, the closer we will be to that decisive moment.

Previous wars were actually preparations for the current world; their purpose was to sweep away and destroy the previous world. However, this war does not seek the destruction or elimination of the system, but rather its strengthening and transformation.

To achieve this, it is essential to transform the economy so that people depend directly on the state to meet their food needs, as well as to comply with other measures, such as mandatory vaccination. If people do not receive their support from the state, knowing the implications, they will not submit to vaccination. Therefore, any event that occurs, especially a war, is aimed at forcing the population to accept this dependence.

Economic and social consequences of the war

The media and political manipulation being carried out has a clear objective: to undermine social cohesion and impoverish citizens. In France, thousands are demonstrating against Macron, while in Spain the resistance seems more contained. However, the discontent is there, latent, manifesting itself in the fight for our autonomy.

In turn, the tariff war between Europe and the United States, where €26 billion will be allocated to steel and aluminum exports, only exacerbates the situation. Who really benefits from all this? It’s not high-ranking officials like Ursula von der Leyen or the controversial Borrell, but all of us who will pay the consequences.

Even if the war doesn’t escalate, the result could be a large-scale economic reset, part of a broader plan to control the global economy and possibly lead to a form of modern slavery.

The mandatory investment in defense, implemented by several European Union countries, is presented under the guise of seeking lasting peace, but in reality it could lead to restrictions on freedoms globally, especially in the West.

This war is intrinsically linked to a plan to transform humanity, adding a disturbing dimension to the current situation. The goal is not freedom or democracy; it is essential to transform the economy in such a way that people depend directly on the state to meet their food needs.

Everything is designed to impose this measure, and for this to happen in a system that, in theory, allows free trade and free enterprise, significant change is required. What can bring about such a transformation in an economic system, if not through a major war or the threat of one? That is the main objective.

Citizen Resistance

We cannot stand idly by. At a time when we are invited to reflect on the future, inaction is not an option. We must speak out and say, “Don’t count on me,” don’t count on me for a new war that will ultimately serve as a sacrifice like the others. It is essential to speak out: we do not want to be part of a conflict we did not ask for, especially when threats of war and invasion are spread without clear justification, such as the alleged Russian attack on Europe. I say alleged because Russia has clearly given no indication that it wants to invade any European country.

The current situation is perceived not only as a confrontation between nations, but as a duel of intelligence, where some seek to execute harmful plans while others try to expose them. As the narrative unfolds, the population is faced with the need to question established truths and understand that the future may already be predetermined by those in power.

The political theater unfolding before our eyes aims to impoverish and divide us. It’s time to wake up and question what is happening. The darkness may be closer than we think. Resistance begins with awareness and collective action.

History teaches us that behind every crisis, there are hidden interests that benefit from chaos. Let’s not let them turn us into their pawns!

---

IF THIS HUMANITY ALLOWS A THIRD WORLD WAR WITHOUT OPENING ITS MOUTH OR MOVING A FINGER, ALL THAT’S LEFT IS TO WISH IT A SWIFT AND FINAL EXTINCTION. IF NOT, WHAT COULD EMERGE FROM PEACE CANNOT BE BETTER… THAN DEATH.